Organizations, individuals, and companies across the country are now looking intensely at innovative methods for financing ADUs. While most ADUs are currently financed in the old-school manner (a patchwork of cash, home equity, family/friends loans, and sweat equity), there is a general policy movement toward figuring out how to enable lower-income homeowners to also be able to build ADUs.
Two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, offer products that allow homeowners to obtain new or refinanced mortgages based on a property’s value after renovation. At least two national lenders sell these: Guaranteed Rate and Eagle Home Mortgage. In addition to GSE products, certain regional banks, like Umpqua, offer portfolio renovation loans with greater flexibility in loan-to-value (LTV) ratio and/or credit than the GSEs offer.
Under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), lenders with more than $10 billion in assets, like Umpqua, are subject to a 43% debt-to-income (DTI) limit for loans on their portfolios, and are only permitted to count rental income from an existing unit with a history of rental or a current lease. TILA also restricts lenders of any size from providing instruction to appraisers, so no lender can experiment with modifying appraisal standards, like using income-based valuations.
Editorial note: Many local banks and credit unions nationwide will offer renovation financing. Umpqua Bank is highlighted because it seems to have done more renovation mortgages for ADUs than than other regional banks and credit unions thus far.
All ADU typologies can be financed: attached, detached, and conversions
Loan types: adjustable, fixed
Interest-only option during construction (single-close)
Umpqua has funded about 100 ADU projects with these products
Consolidated Community Credit Union/CDFI (Portland, Oregon-Washington)
Offers portfolio HELOCs (as well as first mortgages) based on after-completed value
(projected rental income considered for qualification)
CDFIs and smaller lenders (less than $10B in assets) have the greatest regulatory flexibility to expand loan eligibility for loans they intend to keep the loans on their portfolios. So far, their experiments have been concentrated on allowing projected rental income from unbuilt ADUs to count toward qualifying income for the loan.
The project received a $1.75 grant million from the JP Morgan Chase Foundation. Their initial product is a single-close construction-to-permanent (C2P) loan with a grant for a free initial site assessment
Joint effort of LA-Mas, Genesis LA Economic Growth Corporation, Self-Help Federal Credit Union, St. Joseph LA Family Housing Center, Housing Rights Center, combining household advising and assistance, ADU design and finance. Received a $1.75 grant million from the JP Morgan Chase Foundation.
Owners of single-family homes, duplexes and triplexes can qualify to receive a loan up to $30,000 for an ADU remodeling project. Loan amount is based on estimated cost of the project. The loan has no monthly payments and does not become due until the owner sells, transfers ownership, or undertakes a cash-out refinance of the home.
The loans are interest-free and offer gap funding to eligible Boston homeowners who wish to create an ADU in their homes in the pilot areas of East Boston, Jamaica Plain, and Mattapan.
A Place for You (ADUs for homeless families, Multnomah County, Oregon)
Homeowners were provided a standardized 384-square foot one-bedroom detached ADU at no cost in exchange for providing rent-free housing for a homeless person or family for five years. At the end of the period the homeowner buy the unit at the fair market price. This pilot project was managed by Enhabit, a nonprofit that ceased operations in 2018. Here is a short article about the project and another from the local press.
The Second Dwelling Unit (Accessory Dwelling Unit) Pilot Program is exploring ways to make it possible for homeowners to construct housing for homeless families and individuals.
The pilot program encourages the development of accessory dwelling units in the following ways: by streamlining the permit approvals process, providing technical assistance to homeowners, providing some financing options, and promoting accessory dwelling units through an architectural design competition.
The County will provide a maximum subsidy of $75,000 per unit to build 2-3 new ADUs. The County will provide a maximum subsidy of $50,000 per unit to preserve 2-3 existing unpermitted ADUs. The subsidy will be provided in the form of a soft loan or forgivable loan tied to a commitment to rent the ADU to a homeless family/individual or participant in the housing choice voucher program.
Dweller finances, sites, gets permits for and manages a prefabricated one-bedroom rental ADU and pays the homeowner a ground lease for a term of XX years. Dweller’s financing is based on its business model, not the equity or capacity of the homeowner. Homeowners can buy out the lease. Homeowners can also buy a fully installed ADU from Dweller for $130,000.
United Dwellings finances, gets permits and remodels a homeowner’s garage into an ADU and manages it as a rental property and pays the homeowner a share of the rent. For its “standard fifteen-year lease, United Dwelling sets aside $700 of the rent collected each month to pay our financing costs. An additional 20% of the rent is retained by United Dwelling for operations and maintenance. The remainder is paid to the homeowner.”
ADU Builder uses pre-fabricated detached ADU designs ranging from 500 (2 bedroom) to 1,000 square feet (3 bedrooms). The company retains “from 0-70% of the total monthly rent. Homeowners who want to earn a larger share of the rent can make a downpayment on the ADU. Homeowners who choose not to make a downpayment will get 30% of the rent. The loan term is 25 years. There is no prepayment penalty, and homeowners can pay back the principal and cancel the contract anytime.”
The company provides up to 17.5% of value of the qualifying home in cash in exchange for a share in future home sale value, for up to 30 years. Company shares in upside gain and accepts risk for loss in value. No interest charges or loan repayment required. If the money is used to build an ADU, the homeowner can apply for what is called a Remodeling Adjustment, which allocates 100 percent of the independently appraised value attributable to your home improvement project to you, so that Unison doesn’t share in that value. The homeowner can buy out company’s share of home ownership prior to sale or 30 years. Example: Qualifying homeowner with home valued at $500,000 receives $50,000 cash. The homeowners use the cash plus savings to build an ADU, appraised at $75,000. The home sells ten years later for $675,000, Unison receives 90% of the appreciation less the ADU value ($600,000 – $500,000 = $90,000.) Homeowner receives $585,000.
Homeowners can receive $35,000 to $250,000 for Point co-investment in their home for ten year term. There is a 3% processing fee. When the homeowner exits the contract, her or his buyback cost is the amount originally received plus a portion of your home’s appreciation since partnering. Point’s share in any appreciation is higher than the share of equity is purchased. If the home has appreciated past a certain threshold, Point’s share is capped. If the home has depreciated, Point will share in the loss, but not proportionately. The equity can be repurchased early with no penalty. Point’s interest is not reflected on the title. Bloomberg article.
Pays part of home purchase down-payment for teachers and school staff in expensive housing markets. At the time of resale, it shares in gain and loss proportional to its investment plus the return of its contribution. It also provides homeowner education and coaching at time of purchase and/or sale.
(Links to Wikipedia definitions)
ADU financing options – private, public and nonprofit – have increased significantly in the last few years, roughly in tandem with the state and local reforms of regulations that prevented ADU construction.
Short of a change in federal law, the way for larger lenders to be able to include projected rent from unbuilt ADUs as qualifying income is for Fannie and other GSEs to allow it in the loans they buy. The Truth In Lending Act (TILA) contains an exemption from Debt to Income (DTI) requirements for loans that are eligible for delivery to Government Sponsored Enterprises. Sharing loan data between the CDFI that are experimenting with projected and interested parties at Fannie Mae could be a helpful next step to encourage a change in policy.
As of now, the market is far too small and experimental to support a secondary market for ADU-specific products.
In addition to the results of these early efforts, cost containment and progress in appraisals of ADUs will affect ADU financing
*Please see https://accessorydwellings.org/ for more information
** Ohana does not necessarily recommend any of these financial products and is not in the business of giving out financial advice. Please consult a financial professional.
We caught up with Cailin from Cross Construction to gain some extremely valuable insight on the actual cost of building an ADU. In VIDEO 1 she goes over permitting and soft costs, VIDEO 2 site costs and VIDEO 3 goes over construction (vertical) costs.
